The History of Fluoride in Drinking Water
In 1945, Grand Rapids, Michigan, became the first city to introduce fluoride into its water supply. This initiative was seen as a significant public health improvement aimed at preventing tooth decay. Consequently, many other cities across the nation followed suit, and the fluoridation of water became a widespread practice.
However, the value of adding fluoride to drinking water has recently been questioned. With fluoride now readily available in toothpaste and mouthwash, a review from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews found that fluoridated water only minimally reduces tooth decay, casting doubt on its effectiveness.
The Potential Risks of Fluoride
Despite being promoted for its dental health benefits, fluoride has been flowing through our taps for decades. But what if this widely accepted chemical is something you would rather avoid?
There is growing evidence that fluoride may pose risks beyond our teeth, potentially affecting thyroid health, cognitive development, and more. This concern has led many people to seek ways to eliminate fluoride from their lives. Whether you're concerned about long-term exposure or simply want cleaner water for your family, there are solutions available. These range from advanced filtration systems to simple DIY methods.
The Campaign to Stop Fluoridation
A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis published in Environmental Research in February linked excessive fluoride exposure to thyroid issues. Furthermore, a 2016 National Toxicology Report noted an association between fluoride and lower IQ in children.
In September, a federal judge ordered the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate fluoride, citing evidence that community water fluoridation at 0.7 mg/L may pose an unreasonable risk to children's health under the Toxic Substances Control Act. The court did not mandate specific steps, leaving the EPA "obligated to take regulatory action in response."
Pharmacist and thyroid specialist Izabella Wentz shared these concerns, stating that reducing fluoride exposure is crucial for supporting overall health and well-being. She noted that while most Western European nations have stopped fluoridating their water, the United States, Canada, and parts of the UK continue the practice.
Methods to Remove Fluoride from Water at Home
As the debate over fluoridation in public water systems continues, many households are choosing to address the issue themselves. Below are some of the most popular methods for reducing fluoride exposure at home.
Reverse Osmosis Systems
Reverse osmosis (RO) systems are highly effective at removing fluoride and other contaminants from drinking water, filtering out up to 84 percent through a semipermeable membrane. This purification process forces water through the membrane, leaving impurities behind. Fluoride expert Richard Sauerheber told The Epoch Times that modern RO systems can operate for years with minimal maintenance while effectively reducing fluoride levels.
However, RO systems have certain drawbacks. They can produce up to 17 gallons of wastewater for every gallon of filtered water and remove beneficial minerals, which may need to be reintroduced for taste and health benefits.
Despite these challenges, point-of-use RO systems remain an affordable and attractive option, typically costing under $1,000. They are especially beneficial in areas with higher fluoride contamination. For those seeking more comprehensive filtration, whole-house RO systems can cost upwards of $15,000.
Activated Alumina Filters
Activated alumina filters, such as Berkey’s PF-2, can remove up to 97 percent of fluoride and provide a convenient countertop solution that requires no plumbing or electricity. These filters use aluminum oxide to capture fluoride molecules on their porous surface.
However, there are concerns that small amounts of aluminum may be released into the water, and in alkaline conditions, these filters may leach harmful aluminum-fluoride complexes. Filters must be replaced regularly, typically after 1,000 gallons, and some users report a decline in water quality over time.
It should be noted that aluminum exposure might be of concern for those using activated alumina filters.
Bone Char Filters
Bone char is another distinct option for filtering fluoride from drinking water. Made from crushed animal bones heated in a kiln under low-oxygen conditions, bone char naturally absorbs fluoride and other contaminants, such as heavy metals, making it an effective filtration tool. Bone char’s ability to trap fluoride raises an important question: If animal bones can absorb fluoride so effectively, what impact might fluoride have on the bones in our own bodies?
Research shows that 99 percent of fluoride lives in bones. A 2023 study in JAAOS Global Research & Reviews found that children living in areas with higher fluoride levels in drinking water experienced more bone fractures, especially in the arm and elbow.
Bone char filters work through adsorption, where fluoride molecules adhere to the surface of the char as water passes through. However, its filtration lifespan can be unpredictable, varying with fluoride levels, and requires regular monitoring and replacement.
Sauerheber cautions that the quality of bone char varies by source—char from Scotland is known to be highly effective but harder to find, while Brazilian char may be less reliable. This variability makes reverse osmosis a more consistent option for most households.
Ion Exchange Systems
Ion exchange systems use resin beads to replace fluoride ions with less harmful ions, such as chloride, effectively lowering fluoride levels. However, these systems come with environmental concerns—plastic resin beads contribute to plastic waste, and aging filters may release microplastics or concentrated fluoride.
Frequent filter replacements make ion exchange systems expensive, particularly in regions with high fluoride levels. Additionally, the environmental impact raises sustainability concerns for many households, said Volinchak.
Limitations of Certified Filtration Products
Volinchak points out that not all filtration systems perform as effectively as their certifications suggest. Organizations like the Water Quality Association and the National Sanitation Foundation certify filters based on their ability to remove a specific percentage of contaminants. However, these certifications do not guarantee that the filtered water is entirely safe to drink.
Volinchak warns that even filters claiming to remove 98 percent of a contaminant may be insufficient if the contaminant levels in the source water are particularly high. In such cases, harmful amounts of fluoride can remain after filtration. This highlights the importance of regularly testing your water’s contamination levels to ensure your filtration method is effective.
Distillation: A DIY Approach
For those seeking a more hands-on method to remove fluoride, distillation provides a reliable, though labor-intensive, solution. This process involves boiling water and collecting the steam, which is then condensed back into liquid, leaving fluoride and other contaminants behind. However, distilled water lacks minerals, which many people find results in a flat or bland taste.
Sauerheber notes, “Distillation works well but requires labor on the part of the consumer,” and it is essential to remineralize the water to avoid drinking overly purified, mineral-deficient water.
While distillation is highly effective at removing fluoride, it requires time, equipment, and the additional step of reintroducing essential minerals.
For those looking for a more convenient solution, water distillation machines offer an automated approach to fluoride removal. Distillation units are available in various sizes, from compact countertop models to larger units suited for higher volume needs.
Although they eliminate the manual labor of traditional distillation, these machines produce mineral-free water, requiring remineralization for optimal taste and health. Additionally, they can be energy-intensive, which may increase utility costs over time.
Five Ways to Reduce Your Fluoride Burden
Reducing fluoride exposure is important for maintaining health. If you have already been exposed or live in an area with high fluoride levels, there are steps you can take to mitigate its effects. While no supplements can directly neutralize fluoride, certain nutrients and lifestyle changes may support the body’s natural detoxification processes. 1. Be Mindful of Fluoride in Foods and Products
Beyond water, fluoride can sneak into your daily routine through common foods, beverages, and products. Wentz highlights that black and red teas and certain medications are hidden sources of fluoride because tea plants absorb fluoride from the soil. Additionally, foods processed with fluoridated water and certain pesticides can introduce fluoride into your diet, further contributing to overall exposure.
“Swapping out conventional dental hygiene products for ones made without fluoride,” Wentz says, is another simple way to lower your fluoride intake. Reading labels and choosing fluoride-free options wherever possible can make a big difference.
While the American Dental Association advises most people—children, adolescents, and adults—to brush twice a day with fluoride toothpaste for optimal dental health, many holistic dentists remain skeptical. They argue that there is not enough long-term evidence to fully support the safety of fluoride use in dental care.
2. Boost Your Nutrient Intake
Boosting nutrient intake can help counter fluoride’s effects on the body, particularly by supporting thyroid function. Fluoride competes with iodine, which is essential for hormone production. Ensuring adequate iodine intake from sources like seaweed, fish, dairy, or iodized salt helps protect the thyroid. However, Wentz cautions against high-dose iodine supplements, especially for those with thyroid disorders like Hashimoto’s, as it may worsen the condition.
Calcium is another crucial nutrient, as it can bind with fluoride and reduce bone absorption. Magnesium helps balance fluoride and calcium, while antioxidants like vitamin C and selenium protect against the oxidative stress caused by fluoride exposure.
Wentz recommends getting these essential nutrients primarily through a whole-food diet. However, supplements can provide an effective alternative for those with deficiencies
Bottom Line
The debate on the benefits and risks of fluoride in drinking water continues to be a contentious issue. While some people are comfortable with the status quo, others are seeking ways to reduce or eliminate their exposure to this chemical. The methods to achieve this vary, from advanced filtration systems to simple DIY methods. Ultimately, the choice depends on individual preferences, budget, and the level of fluoride in the local water supply.
What are your thoughts on this issue? Do you think the benefits of fluoride outweigh the potential risks or vice versa? Share your thoughts and this article with your friends. And don't forget to sign up for the Daily Briefing, which is delivered every day at 6pm.
The History of Fluoride in Drinking Water
In 1945, Grand Rapids, Michigan, became the first city to introduce fluoride into its water supply. This initiative was seen as a significant public health improvement aimed at preventing tooth decay. Consequently, many other cities across the nation followed suit, and the fluoridation of water became a widespread practice.
However, the value of adding fluoride to drinking water has recently been questioned. With fluoride now readily available in toothpaste and mouthwash, a review from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews found that fluoridated water only minimally reduces tooth decay, casting doubt on its effectiveness.
The Potential Risks of Fluoride
Despite being promoted for its dental health benefits, fluoride has been flowing through our taps for decades. But what if this widely accepted chemical is something you would rather avoid?
There is growing evidence that fluoride may pose risks beyond our teeth, potentially affecting thyroid health, cognitive development, and more. This concern has led many people to seek ways to eliminate fluoride from their lives. Whether you're concerned about long-term exposure or simply want cleaner water for your family, there are solutions available. These range from advanced filtration systems to simple DIY methods.
The Campaign to Stop Fluoridation
A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis published in Environmental Research in February linked excessive fluoride exposure to thyroid issues. Furthermore, a 2016 National Toxicology Report noted an association between fluoride and lower IQ in children.
In September, a federal judge ordered the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate fluoride, citing evidence that community water fluoridation at 0.7 mg/L may pose an unreasonable risk to children's health under the Toxic Substances Control Act. The court did not mandate specific steps, leaving the EPA "obligated to take regulatory action in response."
Pharmacist and thyroid specialist Izabella Wentz shared these concerns, stating that reducing fluoride exposure is crucial for supporting overall health and well-being. She noted that while most Western European nations have stopped fluoridating their water, the United States, Canada, and parts of the UK continue the practice.
Methods to Remove Fluoride from Water at Home
As the debate over fluoridation in public water systems continues, many households are choosing to address the issue themselves. Below are some of the most popular methods for reducing fluoride exposure at home.
Reverse Osmosis Systems
Reverse osmosis (RO) systems are highly effective at removing fluoride and other contaminants from drinking water, filtering out up to 84 percent through a semipermeable membrane. This purification process forces water through the membrane, leaving impurities behind. Fluoride expert Richard Sauerheber told The Epoch Times that modern RO systems can operate for years with minimal maintenance while effectively reducing fluoride levels.
However, RO systems have certain drawbacks. They can produce up to 17 gallons of wastewater for every gallon of filtered water and remove beneficial minerals, which may need to be reintroduced for taste and health benefits.
Despite these challenges, point-of-use RO systems remain an affordable and attractive option, typically costing under $1,000. They are especially beneficial in areas with higher fluoride contamination. For those seeking more comprehensive filtration, whole-house RO systems can cost upwards of $15,000.
Activated Alumina Filters
Activated alumina filters, such as Berkey’s PF-2, can remove up to 97 percent of fluoride and provide a convenient countertop solution that requires no plumbing or electricity. These filters use aluminum oxide to capture fluoride molecules on their porous surface.
However, there are concerns that small amounts of aluminum may be released into the water, and in alkaline conditions, these filters may leach harmful aluminum-fluoride complexes. Filters must be replaced regularly, typically after 1,000 gallons, and some users report a decline in water quality over time.
It should be noted that aluminum exposure might be of concern for those using activated alumina filters.
Bone Char Filters
Bone char is another distinct option for filtering fluoride from drinking water. Made from crushed animal bones heated in a kiln under low-oxygen conditions, bone char naturally absorbs fluoride and other contaminants, such as heavy metals, making it an effective filtration tool. Bone char’s ability to trap fluoride raises an important question: If animal bones can absorb fluoride so effectively, what impact might fluoride have on the bones in our own bodies?
Research shows that 99 percent of fluoride lives in bones. A 2023 study in JAAOS Global Research & Reviews found that children living in areas with higher fluoride levels in drinking water experienced more bone fractures, especially in the arm and elbow.
Bone char filters work through adsorption, where fluoride molecules adhere to the surface of the char as water passes through. However, its filtration lifespan can be unpredictable, varying with fluoride levels, and requires regular monitoring and replacement.
Sauerheber cautions that the quality of bone char varies by source—char from Scotland is known to be highly effective but harder to find, while Brazilian char may be less reliable. This variability makes reverse osmosis a more consistent option for most households.
Ion Exchange Systems
Ion exchange systems use resin beads to replace fluoride ions with less harmful ions, such as chloride, effectively lowering fluoride levels. However, these systems come with environmental concerns—plastic resin beads contribute to plastic waste, and aging filters may release microplastics or concentrated fluoride.
Frequent filter replacements make ion exchange systems expensive, particularly in regions with high fluoride levels. Additionally, the environmental impact raises sustainability concerns for many households, said Volinchak.
Limitations of Certified Filtration Products
Volinchak points out that not all filtration systems perform as effectively as their certifications suggest. Organizations like the Water Quality Association and the National Sanitation Foundation certify filters based on their ability to remove a specific percentage of contaminants. However, these certifications do not guarantee that the filtered water is entirely safe to drink.
Volinchak warns that even filters claiming to remove 98 percent of a contaminant may be insufficient if the contaminant levels in the source water are particularly high. In such cases, harmful amounts of fluoride can remain after filtration. This highlights the importance of regularly testing your water’s contamination levels to ensure your filtration method is effective.
Distillation: A DIY Approach
For those seeking a more hands-on method to remove fluoride, distillation provides a reliable, though labor-intensive, solution. This process involves boiling water and collecting the steam, which is then condensed back into liquid, leaving fluoride and other contaminants behind. However, distilled water lacks minerals, which many people find results in a flat or bland taste.
Sauerheber notes, “Distillation works well but requires labor on the part of the consumer,” and it is essential to remineralize the water to avoid drinking overly purified, mineral-deficient water.
While distillation is highly effective at removing fluoride, it requires time, equipment, and the additional step of reintroducing essential minerals.
For those looking for a more convenient solution, water distillation machines offer an automated approach to fluoride removal. Distillation units are available in various sizes, from compact countertop models to larger units suited for higher volume needs.
Although they eliminate the manual labor of traditional distillation, these machines produce mineral-free water, requiring remineralization for optimal taste and health. Additionally, they can be energy-intensive, which may increase utility costs over time.
Five Ways to Reduce Your Fluoride Burden
Reducing fluoride exposure is important for maintaining health. If you have already been exposed or live in an area with high fluoride levels, there are steps you can take to mitigate its effects. While no supplements can directly neutralize fluoride, certain nutrients and lifestyle changes may support the body’s natural detoxification processes. 1. Be Mindful of Fluoride in Foods and Products
Beyond water, fluoride can sneak into your daily routine through common foods, beverages, and products. Wentz highlights that black and red teas and certain medications are hidden sources of fluoride because tea plants absorb fluoride from the soil. Additionally, foods processed with fluoridated water and certain pesticides can introduce fluoride into your diet, further contributing to overall exposure.
“Swapping out conventional dental hygiene products for ones made without fluoride,” Wentz says, is another simple way to lower your fluoride intake. Reading labels and choosing fluoride-free options wherever possible can make a big difference.
While the American Dental Association advises most people—children, adolescents, and adults—to brush twice a day with fluoride toothpaste for optimal dental health, many holistic dentists remain skeptical. They argue that there is not enough long-term evidence to fully support the safety of fluoride use in dental care.
2. Boost Your Nutrient Intake
Boosting nutrient intake can help counter fluoride’s effects on the body, particularly by supporting thyroid function. Fluoride competes with iodine, which is essential for hormone production. Ensuring adequate iodine intake from sources like seaweed, fish, dairy, or iodized salt helps protect the thyroid. However, Wentz cautions against high-dose iodine supplements, especially for those with thyroid disorders like Hashimoto’s, as it may worsen the condition.
Calcium is another crucial nutrient, as it can bind with fluoride and reduce bone absorption. Magnesium helps balance fluoride and calcium, while antioxidants like vitamin C and selenium protect against the oxidative stress caused by fluoride exposure.
Wentz recommends getting these essential nutrients primarily through a whole-food diet. However, supplements can provide an effective alternative for those with deficiencies
Bottom Line
The debate on the benefits and risks of fluoride in drinking water continues to be a contentious issue. While some people are comfortable with the status quo, others are seeking ways to reduce or eliminate their exposure to this chemical. The methods to achieve this vary, from advanced filtration systems to simple DIY methods. Ultimately, the choice depends on individual preferences, budget, and the level of fluoride in the local water supply.
What are your thoughts on this issue? Do you think the benefits of fluoride outweigh the potential risks or vice versa? Share your thoughts and this article with your friends. And don't forget to sign up for the Daily Briefing, which is delivered every day at 6pm.
