Bedard's Call: Transitioning from Covid Amnesty to Covid Amnesia

Obi-Wan Kenobi's Jedi Mind Trick: A Covid Analogy

Imagine Obi-Wan Kenobi waving his hand and making thoughts and suspicions disappear. This is what seems to be happening with the Covid narrative, as propagated by the pharmaceutical industry and its allies.

Dr. Rachel Bedard's Opinion: Time to Move On

Dr. Rachel Bedard, a specialist in medicine and criminal justice, recently expressed in the New York Times that it's time for the world to move on from the Covid catastrophe, the pandemic response, and the widespread destruction of liberties. She expressed her concerns about the potential appointment of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. by a possible Donald Trump administration, stating that it could deepen the divisive, counterproductive dynamics that have dominated the politics of health and medicine.

Bedard's Interpretation of Learning from the Pandemic

Despite claiming that her stance is about learning from the pandemic, Bedard's statements suggest otherwise. She seems to advocate for trust in the public health complex that has been misleading the world about the dangers, origins, and potential treatments for Covid for over two years.

Bedard's Criticism of RFK, Jr.

Bedard criticizes RFK, Jr.'s statements as power-driven rather than nuanced, implying that he is unfit for office. She also criticizes those who demand purer foods, suggesting that they are endangering the rest of the population. Furthermore, she expresses concern that Kennedy's appointment could lead to investigations into the pandemic's causes, which she sees as a threat to the enforced amnesia she advocates for.

The Call for Covid Amnesty

Before this, there were calls for "Covid amnesty" for the public health experts who led the pandemic response. The argument, made by Brown University economist Emily Oster, was that everyone did their best and that no one intentionally caused harm. However, this argument overlooks the massive damage caused by the pandemic response, including educational degradation, economic devastation, damage to children's social skills, erosion of civil liberties, hardships caused by vaccination mandates, societal divisions, demonization of those questioning the response, and more.

The Unforgivable Fact: Despite Efforts, A Million People Died

What Oster and Bedard seem to want everyone to forget is that despite the efforts of the public health establishment, a million people still died. This figure is used by the experts, the scientists, the public health officials, the media, and all those who misled the public and caused massive societal disruption. If they claim they did their best and still a million people died, it raises questions about their competence, trustworthiness, and the need for forgiveness.

The Pandemic's Beneficiaries

It's worth noting that those calling for amnesty and amnesia were the ones who benefited from the pandemic. For instance, Oster kept her job and gained fame. The pandemic was also good for bureaucrats, multi-nationals, so-called experts, the media, and internet critics. However, it was not good for the people.

Bottom Line

While some, like Dr. Bedard, are pushing for a transition from Covid amnesty to Covid amnesia, others argue that the damage caused by the pandemic response and the lives lost cannot be forgotten or forgiven. As we reflect on these perspectives, it's crucial to ask ourselves: Should we forget and move on, or should we remember and learn from our mistakes? Share your thoughts and this article with your friends. Don't forget to sign up for the Daily Briefing, which is available every day at 6 pm.