Understanding the New Normal in Germany
In the New Normal Germany, there are certain rules that one must adhere to. The first rule is that one should never compare the New Normal Germany to Nazi Germany. If this rule is broken, the individual may face severe consequences such as being reported to the Federal Criminal Police and domestic Intelligence agency, having their books banned, and their tweets censored.
The Consequences of Breaking the Rules
The author of this article experienced these consequences firsthand. After comparing New Normal Germany to Nazi Germany through the cover artwork of his book, he was prosecuted and convicted by the German authorities. This led to him being labeled as a "hate criminal," an "anti-Semite," and a "trivializer of the Holocaust."
The Second Rule of New Normal Germany
The second rule of New Normal Germany is that one should never display a swastika. However, there are exceptions to this rule. For instance, if you are the Health Minister of New Normal Germany and you're comparing your political opponents to the Nazis, or if you're a popular German celebrity comparing the Russians and their supporters to the Nazis, or if you're a mainstream magazine comparing German populists to the Nazis, then displaying a swastika is acceptable.
The Third Rule of New Normal Germany
The third rule of New Normal Germany is that if you agree with the government, obey their orders, and parrot their propaganda, you are not a "hate criminal." However, if you criticize the government or compare the government to Nazi Germany, you are considered a "hate criminal," an "anti-Semite," and a "trivializer of the Holocaust."
The Experience of the Author
The author recounts his experience in court, where he felt the hostility and contempt from the judges. He describes the trial as a public humiliation ritual and a show of force by the authorities. Despite this, he has decided to submit his case to Germany's supreme court in a bid to defend the right to freedom of expression in Germany.
Bottom Line
The author's experience raises questions about the state of freedom of expression in Germany and the consequences of criticizing the government. It's a thought-provoking tale that serves as a reminder of the importance of defending constitutional rights and democratic principles. What are your thoughts on this matter? Do you think the author's treatment was fair? Share this article with your friends and let's discuss. Don't forget to sign up for the Daily Briefing, which is every day at 6pm.
