Globalists Unmasking Themselves: An Ominous Sign
It wasn't too long ago when globalists revealed their true intentions, almost leading to the loss of individual freedom under the pretext of a health emergency that was blown out of proportion. It's often the case that when globalists are candid about their objectives, it aligns with a manufactured crisis.
In the two years following the collapse of the Covid-19 narrative, there have been suggestions that globalist groups are formulating a new strategy. Evidence indicates that these individuals experienced a startling realization following their failed attempt to establish permanent medical despotism. They discovered that their control over information flow and public discourse was not as extensive as they initially believed.
Despite employing full-spectrum censorship, using algorithms to suppress opposing data, partnering with the government to silence dissent on social media, and threatening economic ostracism for those refusing to take a series of mRNA injections, they were unsuccessful. The truth about Covid-19's minimal Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) and the ineffectiveness of mandates and lockdowns still managed to spread. They were powerless to stop it.
Their ticket to total control was the promotion of the vaccine passport concept, but the alternative media effectively quashed this agenda. Had the passport been successful, everyone would be living in fear of having their passport revoked, losing their economic access for saying the wrong thing, or being forced into Covid-19 camps. Alternatively, we could be in the midst of a bloody civil war.
The events of 2020 were intended to launch the ultimate coup against humanity. Globalists, such as Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum, openly admitted to their plans, declaring Covid-19 as the catalyst for the "Great Reset" and the "Fourth Industrial Revolution." They believed they had won without firing a shot, but they underestimated the number of people who were aware of their motives, particularly in America where over 50 million of these people are armed. The lockdowns have been lifted, the vaccine boosters were largely rejected, fewer people took the vaccine than the CDC claims, and the vaccine passports were defeated. This victory was largely due to alternative media platforms circumventing Big Tech censorship.
This is why the next event is likely to be far worse in scale and consequence. The globalists are already trying to rectify their previous mistake of underestimating citizen journalism. They are openly admitting their intentions to silence us in recent conferences and mainstream articles. The mask is coming off once more, indicating that something very bad is about to happen.
As noted in the 2023 article 'From Covid To Climate Change: Vehicles For Global Authoritarianism', the globalists seem to have shifted their more tyrannical efforts away from the pandemic and into the climate discourse. If you want to know what they are up to these days, you have to watch the climate conferences.
At the end of September, there were several climate change summits, including one held by the WEF in New York called the Sustainable Development Impact Meeting. It was held by the WEF in tandem with the United Nations General Assembly. Not surprisingly, discussions often veered away from climate into "threats to democracy" and complaints about the "spread of disinformation."
John Kerry, former Democratic presidential candidate, former Climate Czar under Joe Biden, and a longtime participant in the WEF, made a shocking statement at the summit. He argued that the 1st Amendment was a "roadblock" to proper governance and was preventing the elites from controlling public consensus.
Firstly, consensus is often overrated and can be harmful. The very basis of science is that it is always up for debate according to the evidence. Once a "consensus" is forced, all due diligence under the scientific method is abandoned.
This was made evident during Covid-19, where the "consensus" was exposed as utterly fabricated and most of the claims made by governments and puppet "medical experts" have been proven false. These were the same people that tried to ban individuals from going to parks and waterboarding at the beach in the name of "flattening the curve."
The concept of man-made climate change is another area where the claim of consensus in science is a lie. There is no evidence of a correlation between carbon emissions and global warming, no evidence that global warming causes extreme weather, and no evidence that our current warming cycle is significant or unique compared to any other warming cycle in history.
John Kerry's assertion that governance requires public information control is concerning. His fundamental disconnect is his belief that it's the job of the elites and the government to moderate information for the greater good. No one gave them permission to do this. The government does not exist to create consensus.
The people are in charge, not politicians. As a politician, you are just a public servant, nothing more. Your opinions on free speech don't matter.
Some of the most egregious disinformation is often released to the public by the government and their approved media sources in the name of "saving democracy." They lie constantly. John Kerry is just angry because now the public has the means to expose him and his cohorts. If a "democracy" requires censorship in order to survive, then it's not worth saving.
Finally, Kerry suggests that democracy is "too slow" in implementing the changes to society that he views as necessary to create consensus and "unity." If the 1st Amendment is a "roadblock" to more effective information control and governance, then he and his associates must intend to remove it. In other words, he believes tyranny would work better because it's much faster than trying to manipulate the public with propaganda.
His arguments fall in line with a number of articles published in the past couple of months from establishment media platforms. The New Yorker recently posted an article asking 'Is It Time To Torch The Constitution?' The New York Times published a treatise titled 'The Constitution Is Sacred. Is It Also Dangerous?' They also wrote an article highlighting the potential positives of despotic governments in countries like Brazil threatening to shut down public access to Elon Musk's X (Twitter) in order to force the site to censor citizen accounts. These people are on a war path to convince the public that free speech is a threat.
When political elitists and their lackeys start attacking free speech, it's usually in preparation for a major crisis that they hope to use as a vehicle to eliminate public freedoms. Free speech is the most important liberty because it enables the populace to discern through debate what the truth is and what to do about it.
The globalists thought they had a lock on information during Covid-19 and they were wrong. They won't make the same mistake again. Whatever the next crisis ends up being, they will definitely seek to silence the alternative media and any rebellious social media platforms before they move forward.
Bottom Line
The recent unmasking of globalists and their intentions is a worrying sign. Their open attack on free speech and their attempts to control public consensus are alarming. The potential for a major crisis being used as a vehicle to eliminate public freedoms is a real concern. What are your thoughts on this issue? Share this article with your friends and let's get a conversation started. Remember, you can sign up for the Daily Briefing, which is delivered every day at 6pm.
Globalists Unmasking Themselves: An Ominous Sign
It wasn't too long ago when globalists revealed their true intentions, almost leading to the loss of individual freedom under the pretext of a health emergency that was blown out of proportion. It's often the case that when globalists are candid about their objectives, it aligns with a manufactured crisis.
In the two years following the collapse of the Covid-19 narrative, there have been suggestions that globalist groups are formulating a new strategy. Evidence indicates that these individuals experienced a startling realization following their failed attempt to establish permanent medical despotism. They discovered that their control over information flow and public discourse was not as extensive as they initially believed.
Despite employing full-spectrum censorship, using algorithms to suppress opposing data, partnering with the government to silence dissent on social media, and threatening economic ostracism for those refusing to take a series of mRNA injections, they were unsuccessful. The truth about Covid-19's minimal Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) and the ineffectiveness of mandates and lockdowns still managed to spread. They were powerless to stop it.
Their ticket to total control was the promotion of the vaccine passport concept, but the alternative media effectively quashed this agenda. Had the passport been successful, everyone would be living in fear of having their passport revoked, losing their economic access for saying the wrong thing, or being forced into Covid-19 camps. Alternatively, we could be in the midst of a bloody civil war.
The events of 2020 were intended to launch the ultimate coup against humanity. Globalists, such as Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum, openly admitted to their plans, declaring Covid-19 as the catalyst for the "Great Reset" and the "Fourth Industrial Revolution." They believed they had won without firing a shot, but they underestimated the number of people who were aware of their motives, particularly in America where over 50 million of these people are armed. The lockdowns have been lifted, the vaccine boosters were largely rejected, fewer people took the vaccine than the CDC claims, and the vaccine passports were defeated. This victory was largely due to alternative media platforms circumventing Big Tech censorship.
This is why the next event is likely to be far worse in scale and consequence. The globalists are already trying to rectify their previous mistake of underestimating citizen journalism. They are openly admitting their intentions to silence us in recent conferences and mainstream articles. The mask is coming off once more, indicating that something very bad is about to happen.
As noted in the 2023 article 'From Covid To Climate Change: Vehicles For Global Authoritarianism', the globalists seem to have shifted their more tyrannical efforts away from the pandemic and into the climate discourse. If you want to know what they are up to these days, you have to watch the climate conferences.
At the end of September, there were several climate change summits, including one held by the WEF in New York called the Sustainable Development Impact Meeting. It was held by the WEF in tandem with the United Nations General Assembly. Not surprisingly, discussions often veered away from climate into "threats to democracy" and complaints about the "spread of disinformation."
John Kerry, former Democratic presidential candidate, former Climate Czar under Joe Biden, and a longtime participant in the WEF, made a shocking statement at the summit. He argued that the 1st Amendment was a "roadblock" to proper governance and was preventing the elites from controlling public consensus.
Firstly, consensus is often overrated and can be harmful. The very basis of science is that it is always up for debate according to the evidence. Once a "consensus" is forced, all due diligence under the scientific method is abandoned.
This was made evident during Covid-19, where the "consensus" was exposed as utterly fabricated and most of the claims made by governments and puppet "medical experts" have been proven false. These were the same people that tried to ban individuals from going to parks and waterboarding at the beach in the name of "flattening the curve."
The concept of man-made climate change is another area where the claim of consensus in science is a lie. There is no evidence of a correlation between carbon emissions and global warming, no evidence that global warming causes extreme weather, and no evidence that our current warming cycle is significant or unique compared to any other warming cycle in history.
John Kerry's assertion that governance requires public information control is concerning. His fundamental disconnect is his belief that it's the job of the elites and the government to moderate information for the greater good. No one gave them permission to do this. The government does not exist to create consensus.
The people are in charge, not politicians. As a politician, you are just a public servant, nothing more. Your opinions on free speech don't matter.
Some of the most egregious disinformation is often released to the public by the government and their approved media sources in the name of "saving democracy." They lie constantly. John Kerry is just angry because now the public has the means to expose him and his cohorts. If a "democracy" requires censorship in order to survive, then it's not worth saving.
Finally, Kerry suggests that democracy is "too slow" in implementing the changes to society that he views as necessary to create consensus and "unity." If the 1st Amendment is a "roadblock" to more effective information control and governance, then he and his associates must intend to remove it. In other words, he believes tyranny would work better because it's much faster than trying to manipulate the public with propaganda.
His arguments fall in line with a number of articles published in the past couple of months from establishment media platforms. The New Yorker recently posted an article asking 'Is It Time To Torch The Constitution?' The New York Times published a treatise titled 'The Constitution Is Sacred. Is It Also Dangerous?' They also wrote an article highlighting the potential positives of despotic governments in countries like Brazil threatening to shut down public access to Elon Musk's X (Twitter) in order to force the site to censor citizen accounts. These people are on a war path to convince the public that free speech is a threat.
When political elitists and their lackeys start attacking free speech, it's usually in preparation for a major crisis that they hope to use as a vehicle to eliminate public freedoms. Free speech is the most important liberty because it enables the populace to discern through debate what the truth is and what to do about it.
The globalists thought they had a lock on information during Covid-19 and they were wrong. They won't make the same mistake again. Whatever the next crisis ends up being, they will definitely seek to silence the alternative media and any rebellious social media platforms before they move forward.
Bottom Line
The recent unmasking of globalists and their intentions is a worrying sign. Their open attack on free speech and their attempts to control public consensus are alarming. The potential for a major crisis being used as a vehicle to eliminate public freedoms is a real concern. What are your thoughts on this issue? Share this article with your friends and let's get a conversation started. Remember, you can sign up for the Daily Briefing, which is delivered every day at 6pm.
